Medical chronology software: the dated directory

By Ahmed Jemaa, Co-Founder and CEO of Medrecords AI. Updated 2026-11-12.

Limits: Every product fact comes from the vendor's own website, read on 2026-11-12 and linked in each row. We have not tested these products, and "not published" means we did not find the fact on the pages we read, not that the product lacks it.

What is medical chronology software?

It is software that turns a pile of medical records (PDFs, scans, faxes, sometimes handwriting) into a table of dated events: visits, diagnoses, procedures, medications, test results. Each entry points back to the source page, so a reviewer can check it. Most products add search, questions about the record, duplicate removal and exports to Word or PDF. Some sell the chronology inside a case management system, some pair it with record retrieval, and some put a nurse or physician between the software and you. The output is a working draft. The person who relies on it still checks it.

All 32 products, as of 2026-11-12

Sorted with our product first, then in the order we researched them, not by quality. "Type" is what the vendor sells; "Built for" is who the vendor's own pages address. Click through to the per-attribute pages for features, output formats, prices, security terms and trial terms.

"Not published" means we did not find it on the pages linked in that row. It does not mean the product lacks it. Vendors can send corrections; see the methodology.

What the 32 vendor pages state, in numbers

We counted what each vendor says on its own pages. The gaps are as useful as the facts: a physician who needs a BAA before the first upload has 23 vendors to ask, because their pages don't say.

3 patterns stand out. First, price: 19 of 32 sell only through a demo or a quote, so the pricing page covers the 13 you can cost out today. Second, the BAA: HIPAA gets mentioned far more often than a signed agreement, and the security page explains why that difference matters. Third, duplicates: only 6 vendors state duplicate handling as a feature, yet duplicate pages drive both reading time and, on per-page plans, the bill.

What the top search results leave out

On 2026-11-12 we pulled Google's top results for "medical chronology software" and 3 close searches ("best medical chronology software", "ai medical chronology software", "medical chronology software pricing"), then read every list we found. What we saw:

• The longest named list has 14 products, and a vendor wrote it about its own category. Other lists name 6, 7 or 8.
• Every result is written for law firms or insurers. None addresses a physician doing IME, QME or standard-of-care review, although several products court that work.
• No list dates its rows or links each fact to the page it came from. 1 comparison prints "estimated" prices for competitors without a source.
• No list works out what a file costs across the 5 pricing models in use (per page, capped per record set, per case, monthly page allowance, per seat).

This site does those 4 things. It lists 32 products, cites and dates each fact, keeps a physician's questions in view, and runs a cost calculator on published prices only.

How to read a row: the 5 types of product

Products that look alike on a search page sell different things. The "Type" column sorts them into 5 kinds:

For a physician, the type matters more than the feature list. A module inside a law firm's case management system is of no use to a solo IME examiner. A service adds turnaround days. A general AI assistant can answer questions about a short file but isn't built to cite pages on every row.

Products whose pages name physicians, IME or QME work

Most of the 32 address attorneys. These 6 say on their own pages that they serve physicians or medical-legal examiners. This is a filter on what vendors say, not a ranking:

• Medrecords AI (ours): names physician reviewers, IME and QME clinics and hospital risk teams; bills per deduplicated page.
• MediScan AI: lists QME and IME use cases first; monthly plans from $169 for 1,200 pages; 15-day free trial.
• LongHealth EvalPath: built around the medical-legal evaluation itself, with exam dictation and AMA Guides impairment ratings; no published price.
• Superinsight: offers licensed med-legal physicians a free platform with a chronology they can customize; its main buyers are disability and injury attorneys.
• Wisedocs: names IME teams next to claims and legal teams; pairs software with expert review; quote only.
• ChartInsight: sells med-legal record review with specialty outputs such as internal medicine; editable DOCX or PDF; quote only.

InPractice and CaseMark are left out because the pages we read address legal and insurance teams. Both still publish prices low enough to test on 1 file.

5 checks before you shortlist

1. Citations that survive the export. A link inside the app is not the same as a link inside the Word file you edit. See output formats.
2. What a billed page is. Uploaded pages, deduplicated pages and 400-token "billable pages" are 3 different units. See pricing.
3. A signed BAA before the first upload. "HIPAA compliant" on a web page is not an agreement. See security.
4. A trial big enough for your real file. Trials run from 100 pages to unlimited free chronologies. See trials.
5. Duplicates and gaps. Only a few vendors say how they handle either. Ask, and test on a file where you know the answer. See features.

Questions buyers ask about medical chronology software